MINERÍA la mejor puerta de acceso al sector minero EDICIÓN 576 / SEPTIEMBRE 2025 96 9. El Estado, en conjunto con la industria y las comunidades deben generar las conversaciones y acuerdos necesarios para diseñar escenarios del futuro de la transición minera que promuevan el desarrollo territorial y apuesten por un legado sostenible basado en el bienestar de las comunidades. 10.En el ámbito del aporte de otros actores, la academia, a través de evidencia basada en la investigación, puede influir positivamente en una distribución más justa de los riesgos y beneficios relacionados con el proceso de cierre de minas. Creemos que la visión y aprendizajes que aporta la academia y la investigación aplicada, examinando los procesos y las bases de conocimiento de la industria, permitirían avanzar sostenidamente e incidir en la agenda pública para proponer ajustes normativos y enriquecer los procesos de planificación de cierre de faenas mineras, desde un enfoque social. 11.Contar con un Modelo Integrado de Gestión Social de Cierre, es un primer paso para ordenar, sistematizar y disponer de una lógica secuencial de procesos que contribuya a tener una visión complementaria e integrada al cierre técnico. Ofrece la oportunidad de generar un debate y reflexión para revisar la pertinencia de los instrumentos, la temporalidad en que estos procesos deberían desencadenarse y el alcance de aplicación del modelo considerando las variables territoriales, culturales, económicas y sociales. Bibliografía Bainton, N. & Holcombe S. 2018. A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining (CSRM), The University of Queensland, Australia Everingham, J., Svobodova, K., Mackenzie, S. & Witt, K. 2020. ‘Participatory processes, mine closure and social transitions’. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining. University of Queensland: Brisbane. ICMM. 2012.Community Development Toolkit. Owen, J. y Kemp, D. 2018. El cierre de minas y el desempeño social: documento de debate para la industria. Centro para la Responsabilidad Social en Minería, Instituto de Minerales Sustentables, The University of Queensland: Brisbane. Smyth, E. & Vanclay, F. 2017. The Social Framework for Projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35:1, 65-80, DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271539 Worden, S. 2020. Integrated mine closure planning: A rapid scan of innovative corporate practice. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining. University of Queensland: Brisbane. address the requirements of key social actors in the territories in a timely and responsible manner. 9. The State, together with industry and communities, must generate the necessary conversations and agreements to design scenarios for the future of mining transition that promote territorial development and commit to a sustainable legacy based on the well-being of communities. 10.In terms of the contribution of other actors, academia, through research-based evidence, can positively influence a fairer distribution of the risks and benefits associated with the mine closure process. We believe that the vision and lessons learned from academia and applied research, by examining industry processes and knowledge bases, would enable sustained progress and influence the public agenda to propose regulatory adjustments and enrich the planning processes for mine closure, from a social perspective. 11.Having an Integrated Social Management Model for Mine Closure is a first step toward organizing, systematizing, and establishing a sequential process logic that contributes to a complementary and integrated vision of technical closure. It offers the opportunity to generate debate and reflection to review the relevance of instruments, the timing at which these processes should be triggered, and the scope of application of the model, taking into account territorial, cultural, economic, and social variables. References Bainton, N. & Holcombe S. 2018. A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining (CSRM), The University of Queensland, Australia Everingham, J., Svobodova, K., Mackenzie, S. & Witt, K. 2020. ‘Participatory processes, mine closure and social transitions’. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining. University of Queensland: Brisbane. ICMM. 2012.Community Development Toolkit. Owen, J. and Kemp, D. 2018. Mine closure and social performance: An industry discussion paper. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland: Brisbane. Smyth, E. & Vanclay, F. 2017. The Social Framework for Projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35:1, 65-80, DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1271539 Worden, S. 2020. Integrated mine closure planning: A rapid scan of innovative corporate practice. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining. University of Queensland: Brisbane.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTM0Mzk2